I have to open with transparency: I am a Gen-Xer raised in a postmodern educational system in the midst of a post-Christian culture. How I was raised has affected what I read, how I view life, and, most importantly, how I look at the Bible and God. I try to be aware of my “blind spots,” and I know that stating the above sounds very postmodern.
However, I often get concerned at the criticism of postmodernity in the conservative Christian community. Christianity does not fit within the framework of current philosophical and intellectual studies, but Christianity never fit within the framework of any human philosophy: Christianity is not supposed to fit in a worldly mindset (John 15:19; John 17:14). Still, God’s truth can and should overcome any human mindset, so we come back to concerns about postmodernism . . .
Here is my feeble attempt at defining modernism and postmodernism; these definitions are gross simplifications, but they are a place to start. Modernity, which has been the prevalent mindset for the past 500 years, attempts to reach truth through reason, often achieved by scientific experimentation or debate. Postmodernity, which is obviously the reaction to modernity and has been emerging in the past 50 years, realizes that reason often fails to reach a satisfying conclusion.
Modern thinkers will discuss, argue, debate, and then discuss, argue, and debate some more to try to reach a conclusion. The pro is that there is an answer, there is a truth somewhere. The con is that discussion, argumentation, and debate are often poor tools in reaching non-believers; ultimately, Christians might win a debate at the cost of turning away lost souls.
Postmodern thinkers will discuss ideas, leaving the conclusions to the individual participants; all those in the discussion might reach different conclusions and walk away satisfied. The con is that this line of thinking can lead to relativism: what’s right for you is right for you, what’s right for me is right for me. The pro is that postmodern thinking is really the concept of individual faith: from what I see, I believe something to be true.
Critics say that postmodernists believe that there is no truth; however, a better perspective is that postmodernists believe that you cannot know if you have the truth. No truth and not knowing if you have the truth with complete certainty are subtle, but important, differences. Ultimately, if you try to argue with a postmodern thinker, you can make your best case, and he or she can shrug it off as being your conclusion from your experience. His or her conclusion might be vastly different, because he or she has had vastly different experiences.
Then, a modern thinker often elevates the argument, becoming (what postmodernists consider) arrogant and judgmental: you might win the argument but you’ve lost the chance to impact a non-believer. Postmodernism hinges on faith; from what you’ve heard (from God’s Word) and experienced (by the Spirit’s leading), you’ve acknowledged as truth. The core discussion with a postmodernist is faith: ask them to look at God’s Word, ask them to pray, ask them to be open to the possibility of God. Then pray yourself: pray that God will open their eyes and He will lead them to Him. Be there to listen to their questions and concerns without passing judgment: you won’t argue them into heaven, but you might get to see God’s working.
Postmodernism underlies our academics, our religious beliefs, and our culture. We can complain that postmodernists are not modernists; we can argue that they need to change their way of thinking; or we can try to reach people. As a Christian with my truth rooted in faith, I’ll pour my efforts into reaching people.
-Michael Windsor











